SB445

Regards regulatory restrictions for administrative rulemaking

Senate | Introduced In Senate

📋 What This Bill Does

Senate Bill 445 aims to adjust the definition of 'regulatory restriction' for administrative rulemaking in Ohio. It requires state agencies to review and reduce the total number of regulatory restrictions by specific percentages over time, with restrictions needing to be removed or amended in order to adopt new ones. The bill also mandates agencies to prepare reports on their progress in reducing regulatory restrictions and to continue efforts even after achieving the required reduction.

Plain English summary · Non-partisan · Auto-generated

Rationale

The bill's focus on reducing regulatory restrictions aligns with libertarian principles of limited government intervention. However, the mandated reduction targets may still impose government control over administrative rulemaking processes, potentially limiting agency flexibility.

Risks and Concerns

Mandated reduction targets could lead to arbitrary eliminations of regulations without considering their individual necessity or impact.
The requirement for simultaneous removal of existing restrictions when adopting new ones may hinder agencies from enacting beneficial regulations.
This legislation may not address the root issue of overregulation and could result in a superficial reduction of restrictions without addressing fundamental regulatory issues.

Platform Citations (2)

2.1 Aggression, Property, and Contract (2_1) SUPPORTS

The bill involves the definition and enforcement of property rights within administrative rules.

2.8 Marketplace Freedom (2_8) SUPPORTS

The bill pertains to government restrictions on property rights and the free market.

Rationale

The bill partially aligns with libertarian principles by potentially reducing regulatory burdens on individuals and businesses. However, it also involves government intervention in rulemaking processes, which may not fully adhere to the principles of limited government and free markets.

Risks and Concerns

Government intervention in defining and reducing regulatory restrictions may still result in unnecessary bureaucratic control.
Mandating specific percentage reductions in regulatory restrictions could lead to arbitrary decision-making rather than a genuine assessment of regulatory necessity.

Platform Citations (2)

Free Markets (free_markets) SUPPORTS

The bill's focus on reducing regulatory restrictions could align with the libertarian stance against government intervention in markets.

Taxation & Spending (taxation_spending) SUPPORTS

The bill indirectly relates to limiting government involvement in regulations, which is in line with reducing the burden of fees and licenses as advocated by the Libertarian Party of Ohio.

Rationale

SB445 aligns with libertarian principles of limited government by aiming to reduce regulatory burdens on individuals and businesses. However, it may raise concerns about potential bureaucratic hurdles and constraints on agencies' flexibility in rulemaking.

Risks and Concerns

Potential risk of hindering agencies' ability to adapt to changing circumstances efficiently.
Possibility of unintended consequences from rigid reduction targets.
Concerns about the impact on regulatory effectiveness and public welfare.

Platform Citations (2)

limited-government SUPPORTS

The bill aims to reduce regulatory restrictions, aligning with the principle of limited government by decreasing state intervention in private affairs.

free-markets SUPPORTS

By potentially reducing regulatory burdens on businesses, the bill can support free-market principles by allowing more autonomy and flexibility.

Legislation

SB445

Regards regulatory restrictions for administrative rulemaking

📋 What This Bill Does

Rationale

Risks and Concerns

Platform Citations (2)

Rationale

Risks and Concerns

Platform Citations (2)

Rationale

Risks and Concerns

Platform Citations (2)

Stay in touch